Kenan Anderson breaks down how the allocation of bids has shifted over the years. What tournaments are on the rise? Which are slipping? How does your state hold up in bids?
The topic for today is what to make of arguments like “your interpretation X leads to Y bad thing” and the common response “but you could read theory on Y bad thing.” Bob likes the former (sometimes) but the latter never.
Bob challenges the use of abbreviated arguments or "enthymemes" in contemporary kritik debate. On his view, they discourage innovation and clash, exclude debaters, and emphasize the judge's knowledge over the skill of the debaters.
Bob argues that the current LD metagame requires a level of argument flexibility unseen in the history of LD. He predicts this year's TOC champ will demonstrate that flexibility and then isolates three factors that could explain why the metagame is where it is today.
In this lull before the season-ending championships, I want to take a moment to congratulate Premier alums, the best non-seniors, and the young women atop the standings. Then I’ll do a little fun speculation about how competitive this year’s TOC could be!
Bob argues that "object fiat" is a conceptually confusing and misleading term. It may be that "object fiat" just refers to counterplans that we don't like.